Aptabit Explained
The hard questions, answered in writing.
A series on how our platform works underneath, what it guarantees by architecture and where its limits are.
The series
Each piece answers an objection that comes up in every evaluation, in the order it usually comes up.
Part 1
Aptabit does not see your data
Why that sentence is only worth something when it follows from the architecture, rather than from a contract clause.
Part 2
Is a local model worse?
Why the comparison that decides anything is between the model and the task, not between two positions on a public leaderboard.
Part 3
It runs on your infrastructure
Why that sentence covers four different arrangements, with four different operating costs, rather than one way of installing software.
Part 4
What the law requires and what architecture solves
Why running in your own environment takes one class of problem off the table, and not the compliance decision that stays with the organization.
Part 5
Why we do not charge per user or per token
Why the way a vendor charges decides how an organization behaves after the purchase, instead of being one more item in the commercial negotiation.
Part 6
What happens when the contract ends
Why continuity for a system in production has to be a property of the architecture, rather than the outcome of an annual renewal.
Still have a question the series doesn't answer?
Send it to our team. The questions that keep coming back become pieces in this series.